Tuesday, 28 September 2010

Tracking musical expenditure: August

A year ago I was inspired to embark on a year long project to monitor by monthly expenditure on music and music-related activities after hearing about a report which suggested that, instead of being the scourge of the music industry, file sharers were the customers most likely to spend more money on music than non-filesharers.  This claim was nothing to new to me - it was one I'd seen iterated time and again in various online file-sharing communities, but I was intrigued to see exactly how such a claim might be borne out when compared to my own spending habits.

This post is an attempt to tie up some loose ends and reflect upon my findings as I add up the expenditure for the final month of the year long tracking project.  Hopefully, I'll be able to offer some broader analysis of the full year in a later post.

If this is the first time you stumbled across this series of posts then there are a few baseline claims that might be worth pointing out:
  • The typical file-sharer spends £77 a year on music
  • Those who claim not to use file-sharing technology spend £44 per year on music
  • Source: BBC

So, how did August measure up?

The total monthly spend on music and music-related activities (ie music games, musical equipment, concerts, etc) came in at a relatively high sum of £226.98 mainly due to some hardware required for a DJ gig.  Music games accounted for another lump sum of £77.32.  A much more modest total of £19.12 was spent on buying music, of which only £5.94 would have been classified as tradiational album/single content.



Overall, that brings the total spend for the last 12 months in at £1770.57 of which £206.87 was spend on albums and singles.  That's £129.87 more than the typical file-sharer spends on music in a year, and a whopping £162.87 more than is spent by those who denied they participated in file-sharing.  What does that tell us?  Well, I'm going to take a more detailed look at these figures in a future post.

1 comment:

阿童木 said...

"Single form" limited time dancers asked swiss replica watches function excellence and rich artistic atmosphere, round replica watches uk case equipped with automatic movement, power storage for about 42 hours, the water up to 30 meters. Table mirror is wear resistant sapphire crystal glass anti dazzle, ensure the high Nailu rolex replica and not easy to wear. Table back the same use of anti wear sapphire crystal glass, both to protect the inner complex movement, but also through the transparent cover to appreciate the movement of the United States, complement each other.

Post a Comment