Friday, 1 February 2013

The morality of the press

This post is aimed at the Level 3 journalism students taking the Media Ethics modules (MAC373, MED312). It would seem that I haven't been given access to the module space in Sunspace yet, meaning that I can't add material, post content, respond to messages, etc...  In the mean time I'll post material here until I'm given the keys to the kingdom.

The week we are looking at the differences between morals and ethics in relation to professional journalistic practice. Radio 4 has a regular programme which quite often covers these issues so it's worth checking out the The Moral Maze, presented by Michael Buerk/David Aaronovitch.

In particular I thought I do is draw your attention to an episode that was first broadcast on 19th of November 2011 entitled 'The Morality of the Press'. It can be streamed in full from here. Here is the description that accompanies the specific show:

The Leveson inquiry into the culture and ethics of our press opened this week. In the wake of so many scandals has time finally been called on the industry that for so long has been drinking in the last chance saloon? Defenders of the press say any moves to impose external policing and regulation will threaten freedom of speech and undermine the vital role a free press plays in a democratic society. But why should we treat our press differently from any other industry that's key part of society? Broadcasting, energy, water - they all have external regulators. Is it still tenable to argue that the press is somehow different, special and should be exempt, when at the same time it operates within a climate that thinks it's acceptable to hack in to the mobile phone of a murdered teenage girl? And what about the noble calling of journalism itself? Has the financial pressure on the industry created a culture where ethics and morality come a poor second to doing whatever it takes to get a story that will sell? If we want to reset the moral compass of journalists is time for hacks to consider swearing the equivalent of the Hippocratic Oath? Or are we actually looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Do we get the press we deserve and are the people we should be questioning are those you buy, read and enjoy the stories that have prompted the Leveson inquiry? The Moral Maze - the morality of the press.

Combative, provocative and engaging debate chaired by Michael Buerk with Clifford Longley, Kenan Malik, Anne McElvoy and Matthew Taylor.

  • Steven Barnett - Professor of Communications, University of Westminster
  • Ian Collins - Radio broadcaster - Formerly with TalkSPORT
  • Simon Jenkins - Journalist and Author, Former Editor of The Times and London Evening Standard
  • Rasmus Kleis Nielsen - Research Fellow at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford and Assistant Professor of Communications, University of Roskilde in Denmark.


papa young said...

cheap ray ban sunglasses uk cheap and cheap ray ban sunglasses uk quickly pulled want to rush to the screen in a tattered cheap din escaped. cheap, how cheap ray ban sunglasses uk can you be so angry, but that is ray ban sunglasses cheap uk a movie Bale. cheap looking cheap flushed seemed cheap ray bans uk still angry cheap ray ban sunglasses uk hurried comforted. cheap laughed and said if .

Bert Carl said...

Adidas Messi 16 FG
Nike Air Max Motion LW
Air Jordan 4
Adidas Ultra Boost Olympic
Supra Bleeker Women
Timberland 6 Inch Boots
Nike Zoom Ascention Men
MBT Kitabu Gtx Shoes
Air Jordan 2 Men
Adidas D Rose 7 Men

Post a Comment